That's over a 100 years ago. I can easily see bitcoin lose much of its value in about 4 decades when the block subsidy is negligible and it relies almost exclusively on transaction fees for security.
I actually agree with this, and that's one reason I, too, prefer Monero - the tail emissions + tx fees are more economically sustainable than tx fees alone.
Yeah, that’s the result of placing function as medium of exchange nd unit of account over function as a store of value, as a deliberate measure to both facilitate exchange and encourage investment outside of the money in productive assets.
Also why, while Bitcoin might arguably be a decent investment if you can take the volatility (note that I am not saying that it is, either), its crappy money compared to major world currencies.
In places like Venezuela, doctors and lawyers spend their days playing Runescape and World of Warcraft, because thlse fictional, virtual currencies are more stable than their real state-backed FIAT currency, and because they can earn more real-world currency by exchanging ingame currency for it than they can as doctors and lawyers in their "equitable" economic system of socialism.