News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Feds seize $50 million in Megaupload assets, lodge new ch... by astrodust on Saturday February 18, 2012 @08:58PM (#3608381)
Maybe I'm just an armchair observer here, but why didn't someone like Kim Dotcom move to a more protected location? With that kind of cash I'm sure he could've earned some favors from a military dictatorship in Fiji, or a country so small that his revenues could've easily eclipsed their GDP. Iceland? Tuvalu? Burkina Faso? There's lots to choose from.
Re:Feds seize $50 million in Megaupload assets, lodge new ch... by rdl on Saturday February 18, 2012 @10:04PM (#3608514)
Having lived in various "more protected locations", I'd rather live in New Zealand than some place like Burkina Faso!

He probably assumed at most he was at risk for civil penalties -- it's not like he was running drugs or supporting jihad. The company was based in HK, and the obvious legal target; his personal residence in another country should have protected him from civil issues related to the company in HK.

However, once criminal charges and an international task force get involved, doomed. Maybe he could have had better intelligence or lobbyists to figure out criminal charges were brewing, but I don't think his behavior was that unreasonable given the ambiguity of what criminal laws megaupload may or may not have been breaking.