Re:VanJS (Vanilla JavaScript): smallest reactive UI framework
by tracker1 on Thursday May 25, 2023 @02:35PM
(#36074373)
No. Reality is that people will disagree with other people. And pretending that an opinion has no value because it might upset someone or apply to a generalization or group that isn't intended to mean "all of Group X" so much as "many/most of Group X, from my experience" as a disclosure doesn't mean that the rest of the statement, that could be impersonal or even offensive to some has no value.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:VanJS (Vanilla JavaScript): smallest reactive UI framework
by duxup on Thursday May 25, 2023 @03:30PM
(#36075026)
If the only person being discussed is the author of the library, and you don’t know them…. what relevance is someone’s experience with other people who share a trait?
The idea of “pretending” here is interesting, I find the whole “ I don't want to judge him” to be its own form of dishonesty….
Re:VanJS (Vanilla JavaScript): smallest reactive UI framework
by not_your_vase on Sunday May 28, 2023 @03:38AM
(#36101968)
I am happy to see that the guy has rejected the idea of renaming the project. I am judging him: he is just as arrogant as any other Googlers. I'm sorry I didn't wanted to judge him, or that I even implied it. He deserved all the judgement. Long live the new definition of Vanilla JavaScript!