Why we created Julia - new language for fresh approach to technical computing

Re:Why we created Julia - new language for fresh approach to... by ViralBShah on Saturday February 18, 2012 @01:20PM (#3607229)

Is it due to openblas not building? This may help:

https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/370

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why we created Julia - new language for fresh approach to... by bandarman on Saturday February 18, 2012 @02:06PM (#3607381)

Thanks for your suggestion. I tried that, but it wasn't it. I'm still getting lots of build errors, culminating with this:

Saving to: `lapack-3.4.0.tgz'

2012-02-19 01:03:26 (55.3 KB/s) - `lapack-3.4.0.tgz' saved [6127787/6127787]

make[3]: gfortran: Command not found make[3]: * [lsame.o] Error 127 /bin/sh: ./testlsame: not found /bin/sh: ./testslamch: not found /bin/sh: ./testdlamch: not found /bin/sh: ./testsecond: not found /bin/sh: ./testdsecnd: not found /bin/sh: ./testieee: not found /bin/sh: ./testversion: not found make[2]: * [lapack_install] Error 127 make[1]: * [lapack-3.4.0/INSTALL/dlamch.o] Error 2 make: * [julia-release] Error 2

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why we created Julia - new language for fresh approach to... by olaf on Saturday February 18, 2012 @03:58PM (#3607732)

Is package gfortran installed?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why we created Julia - new language for fresh approach to... by bandarman on Sunday February 19, 2012 @03:08AM (#3608924)

@olaf: I was missing gfortran and libncurses5-dev. It's working now, sweet. :)

[ Parent | on HN ]