News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A Novel the CIA Spent a Fortune to Suppress by jjk166 on Wednesday May 24, 2023 @02:13PM (#36061982)
No, it is very clear even with the full context that at this point in the article they are referring to the delay of the book being published. The very next sentence states that there were multiple such examples of suppression over his career, indicating that "this act" was a specific one in a sequence of many.
Re:A Novel the CIA Spent a Fortune to Suppress by Convolutional on Wednesday May 24, 2023 @02:43PM (#36062352)
The act is the act of suppression, which they were involved in. They did not participate in the delay portion of the suppression, nor does it say they did.
Re:A Novel the CIA Spent a Fortune to Suppress by jjk166 on Thursday May 25, 2023 @12:28PM (#36072788)
It's not "the act" it's "this act" which they were not involved in. The article says they were involved in the delay, which is innaccurate. They may not have meant to say that, but that's what it says.
Re:A Novel the CIA Spent a Fortune to Suppress by the_af on Wednesday May 24, 2023 @06:59PM (#36064934)
I think that "this act" is poor editing. You cannot ignore the rest of the article.
Re:A Novel the CIA Spent a Fortune to Suppress by jjk166 on Thursday May 25, 2023 @12:25PM (#36072760)
Okay, well the article as written and interpreted using conventional english is inaccurate. Maybe what they meant to say would have been accurate.