News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:“Rewrite It in Rust” Considered Harmful? [pdf] by __s on Wednesday May 24, 2023 @12:39PM (#36060631)
There isn't a name for you, but what you're experiencing is strawman attacks

Like the strawman argument where it creates a flawed argument to declare victory over, the strawman attack picks out the most extreme case to declare victory over

You'll see this done on left/right political debates where instead of recognizing that most people can find agreeable common ground on 80% of issues, extreme advocates will pick out the opposing extreme advocates to vilify each others' groups

I think a lot of Rust programmers appreciate where C is the right tool, & a lot of C programmers can admit that memory errors are a pain in the ass

Re:“Rewrite It in Rust” Considered Harmful? [pdf] by carlmr on Wednesday May 24, 2023 @12:51PM (#36060817)
>I think a lot of Rust programmers appreciate where C is the right tool, & a lot of C programmers can admit that memory errors are a pain in the ass

That's true, however IME C++ programmers are the most in denial. And yes, RAII has helped a lot. But still we see way too many memory errors coming from C++ code bases.

Re:“Rewrite It in Rust” Considered Harmful? [pdf] by avgcorrection on Wednesday May 24, 2023 @05:27PM (#36064069)
Arguing isn’t a game of diplomacy and middle grounds.
Re:“Rewrite It in Rust” Considered Harmful? [pdf] by uecker on Thursday May 25, 2023 @03:03PM (#36074676)
A a C programmer, I think Rust got memory correctness right. Unfortunately, I do not like the rest of the language ;-(