News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Thoughts on R7RS by gchpaco on Friday February 17, 2012 @04:59PM (#3605156)
The problem, I think, is that he wants a low level tool for generating disjoint types (not satisfied by define-record-type, which is not required to be disjoint from vectors or conses or what have you). This would give you the ability to have enums, ML style discriminated unions, simple records, etc. without necessarily requiring that each and every one of them be in the small language.

That said from a practical point of view some sort of record type is long overdue.

Re:Thoughts on R7RS by oddthink on Friday February 17, 2012 @05:33PM (#3605241)
As of the current draft, define-record-type is disjoint. They're "distinct from all existing types" and explicitly mentioned as being disjoint in the notes.
Re:Thoughts on R7RS by gchpaco on Tuesday February 21, 2012 @02:53AM (#3615630)
Ah! Well, that certainly improves things; either I misread the draft or that language wasn't there when I looked.