Re:
by chriscavs on Tuesday May 23, 2023 @11:16AM
(#36045507)
Thanks for the comment! Yes it is a bit of a provocative title hahaha. i don't believe my library can be compared to random-js, since the goals of each are very different. random-js wants to provide the "engine" that replaces Math.random. I want to provide a library of utilities that are engine-agnostic. you can pull in random-js and use their engines to power aimless.js, as an example.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.