News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Recreating RP2040 PIO Interface in an FPGA. Parent comment

Re:Recreating RP2040 PIO Interface in an FPGA by bpye on Sunday May 21, 2023 @01:55PM (#36023253)
Doesn’t PCIe already get you that today? Either with an existing PCIe -> X bridge chip, or an FPGA with PCIe capability?

It’s not cheap, and you need to write device drivers etc - but that’s the case regardless.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Recreating RP2040 PIO Interface in an FPGA by sfrigon on Sunday May 21, 2023 @02:22PM (#36023455)
Maybe PCIe already does something similar, that's not something I have knowledge about.

Though there is a small difference in my opinion, where, from the point of view of the CPU, it should behave as a normal interface, thus the driver should already exist, and only require a change in the device tree (for linux).

It would still require quite a bit of work: - The PIO has to behave bug-for-bug compatible with an existing driver - The exposed pins need have the proper voltage levels & electrical protection

.. but that's just fantasy for now.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Recreating RP2040 PIO Interface in an FPGA by naikrovek on Sunday May 21, 2023 @09:18PM (#36026336)
sounds like PCIe, as mentioned.

there are a few FPGA dev kits which are set up this way. I have one which has a dual core Atom CPU and a large FPGA connected via PCIe, and the speed is fast.

[ Parent | on HN ]