Re:GPT detectors are biased against non-native English writers
by ghaff on Sunday May 21, 2023 @11:27AM
(#36021929)
There's definitely a "what are the benefits of" or "what are the reasons for" format that ChatGPT falls into pretty easily. It's usually not really wrong and would probably serve as a passable high school essay. (And I've probably seen worse marketing copy.)
But it's not very good and, at a minimum, lacks nuance and supporting evidence.
Re:GPT detectors are biased against non-native English writers
by M4v3R on Sunday May 21, 2023 @01:01PM
(#36022793)
The key word from GP is "reliably". Sure, you can probably tell when someone blatantly copied and pasted output from ChatGPT and when the prompt was not very sophisticated (write a comment about X). However for all other cases when someone put even the tiniest bit of effort into the prompt or did some post filtering the reliability of such detection plummets significantly.
There’s definitely a pattern for some prompts, where the model uses an obvious format of:
It’s also comically obvious when suddenly someone who has a reply history full of low-effort juvenile, zero grammar, curse laden posts on video game and meme subs is suddenly writing mini-theses on topics ranging from Swedish forestry management to the chemistry of dyes used in Cambodian textile manufacturing.