We're going to see both improvements in application, and parallel improvements in the underlying model.
Who cares if it's AGI if someone figures out how to turn it into a competent tax accountant?
God, yes. The number of people of HN pushing up their glasses and saying "well, actshually..." when they're basing their opinions off the 3 questions they asked 3.5 is starting to become pretty grating.
Like, anyone who has spent 5 minutes on this forum already knows this. It’s probably not necessary to keep pointing it out. Yes some people don’t know ChatGPT 3.5 is the default for non-paying customers.
Any thread in the topic, simple statistical modeling will get you close to perfect to the distribution of arguments that will appear.
You would think, and yet...
I think that we just don't fully understand everything it gives us yet.
The complaints of "well it explained this wrong" are over-emphasized. The same thing happens with google and with any sort of research. Besides, if you're actually being productive with GPT4, you're going to be asking it stuff that relates to something you do know, and will be able to verify it readily enough. (Especially when it comes to programming and compilers.)
And just a reminder, those of you opining based off your experience with GPT3.5... GPT4 is a huge, huge improvement. Almost to the point of it not really being an incremental improvement, it's so much better it's like a different thing.