Re:Intel Explores Transition to 64-Bit-Only X86S Architecture
by hydroreadsstuff on Saturday May 20, 2023 @05:51PM
(#36015936)
It’s 4GB per address space / per process.
In aggregate you can use more.
Re:Intel Explores Transition to 64-Bit-Only X86S Architecture
by 6510 on Saturday May 20, 2023 @05:56PM
(#36015965)
I vaguely remember some software that put the swap on a ram drive.
Re:Intel Explores Transition to 64-Bit-Only X86S Architecture
by pmalynin on Saturday May 20, 2023 @05:52PM
(#36015943)
Yea the 64 gig thing is from PAE I think.
Re:Intel Explores Transition to 64-Bit-Only X86S Architecture
by EuropeOverlords on Saturday May 20, 2023 @07:39PM
(#36016613)
yet, processors had that, even before 32BIT 4GB issue was even issue in press XD
Re:Intel Explores Transition to 64-Bit-Only X86S Architecture
by EuropeOverlords on Saturday May 20, 2023 @07:38PM
(#36016605)
FIRST year in college you learn about address translation.
but
this 4GB 32BIT myth is spread even between / by people who we are looking for benchmarks, deep technical insights etc.
i hate that people are not computers sometimes,
mixing humanities thinking with technical thinking is cancer. and we are tolerating it,
LTT has milions of subscribers ( if it is not obvious why it is bad i feel bad for you ),
anandtech is intentionally inserting total bull .. inaccuracies into their articles, .......
rule of money as a current totalitarian regime.
Is that true though? 32bit Windows 2003 Enterprise or Datacenter editions were perfectly capable of accessing 64GB or RAM [0]. Even so, that difference from the usual 4GB and 3.xGB was any kind of memory usage for integrated GPU or virtual address space mapping for different hardware.
[0] https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/memory/memor...