News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:LangChain: The Missing Manual by chatmasta on Friday May 19, 2023 @02:38PM (#36005380)
LangChain has moved fast and made a decent first pass at a solution to the problem of LLM orchestration. But I'm skeptical that the first solution will be the best solution, and we should keep an open mind to other approaches.

Personally, I like the more declarative approach that Microsoft is taking with guidance [0]. The two projects are not substitutable at the moment, and might even complement each other, but I'm weary of building a new ecosystem on a possibly overly-complicated first pass solution to the orchestration problem.

[0] https://github.com/microsoft/guidance

Re:LangChain: The Missing Manual by anish_m on Friday May 19, 2023 @02:58PM (#36005584)
Resonate with the assessment. I like guidance too so far, but the dev community is far behind langchain. One big problem I have with langchain is that there are too many wrappers, and its often very confusing what little additional functionality each wrapper is adding up.
Re:LangChain: The Missing Manual by rahimnathwani on Friday May 19, 2023 @05:36PM (#36007125)
s/weary/wary
Re:LangChain: The Missing Manual by chatmasta on Friday May 19, 2023 @05:37PM (#36007138)
Damn, I'm weary of making that mistake so often. Thanks :)
Re:LangChain: The Missing Manual by brianjking on Sunday May 21, 2023 @11:18AM (#36021840)
Yeah, there are so many platforms out there. It is incredibly tough to figure out who will be heading in the right direction.

- https://shreyar.github.io/guardrails/ - https://github.com/NVIDIA/NeMo-Guardrails - https://www.askmarvin.ai/