Re:Apple bans ChatGPT use by employees, report says
by mrtranscendence on Friday May 19, 2023 @12:09PM
(#36003582)
I mean, are you suggesting (for example) that someone who wanted a career in short-form video essays should skip YouTube and host their own videos? I don’t see how that could possibly work in general.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Apple bans ChatGPT use by employees, report says
by EGreg on Friday May 19, 2023 @12:59PM
(#36004207)
You don't see how, say, someone who wants to teach a class and collect tuition might not want to put all their content on YouTube and get a pittance?
And now replace teaching with pretty much any other content. A musician giving a concert, TED talks, etc.
Re:Apple bans ChatGPT use by employees, report says
by mrtranscendence on Friday May 19, 2023 @01:10PM
(#36004360)
Well, the concern I have is about alternatives. Joanna Videoessayist might not have the technical know-how, the business acumen, or the capital to build her own platform — she just wants to make great video essays. Eliminating platforms like YouTube wouldn’t make Joanna better off, it would just cause her to return to her marketing job.
Re:Apple bans ChatGPT use by employees, report says
by EGreg on Friday May 19, 2023 @02:46PM
(#36005464)
No one is eliminating YouTube. We're making a better open source alternative.
If it's good enough, she will leave YouTube just like her mom left AOL and embraced the open Web. Why did content creators leave MSN, CompuServe, et al ?
Re:Apple bans ChatGPT use by employees, report says
by tough on Friday May 19, 2023 @02:15PM
(#36005115)
They should treat youtube as another marketing channel (as a showcase on the street is), but not as their main source of income or backup for example.
- They can run a website with their own personal brand and collect emails there. - They can backup their videos in other services in case youtube close their account ...