Claims of malfeasance go in both directions.
>Policy has to go beyond what is rigorously demonstrated.
Thanks. I can see we're done here.
Yes, indeed. We are done. You are living in a fantasyland, not in the real world of how regulation and politics actually work.
But at least you can admit LNT is consistent with the evidence? The claim to the contrary is an outright lie.
Policy has to go beyond what is rigorously demonstrated. It's not like criminal law. Technologies are not innocent until proven guilty. Just because LNT cannot be demonstrated at the doses relevant to nuclear accidents doesn't mean regulators should assume no effect.