News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Supreme Court Rules Andy Warhol’s Prince Art Is Copyright... by jrajav on Thursday May 18, 2023 @06:55PM (#35995404)
I'm not an expert on the science part, but as far as the arts are concerned, IP being inheritable not only does not promote progress, it actively harms it. See: The Marvin Gaye estate and the damage they wreak on the music industry by thrashing about every few years with another cash grab lawsuit based on hamfisted and incompetent explanations of music theory.
Re:Supreme Court Rules Andy Warhol’s Prince Art Is Copyright... by chrismcb on Thursday May 18, 2023 @10:00PM (#35996890)
I don't think that is a very good example of active harm due to inheritance. Marvin gaye could have done the exact same thing if he was still alive.
Re:Supreme Court Rules Andy Warhol’s Prince Art Is Copyright... by mr_toad on Friday May 19, 2023 @03:17AM (#35998767)
Marvin Gaye was making music, which is to be encouraged. His estate makes nothing.