I doubt it, since the Warhol work here has strong similarities to another one, while text-to-image models only directly reproduce existing art when something occurs as multiple (close) duplicates in the training data. Which can be quite easily avoided, like using a vector database to filter for similar items before training.

More like, this ruling is irrelevant in the age of AI. I can take your photo, change the perspective, angle, exposure, etc, and now you'd be hard pressed to prove that I started with your photo. It's just 'transformation', but it's not simple transformation in a way you could prove a connection.