Re:DuckDuckGo owns the #2 position in mobile market share in...
by vngzs on Wednesday May 17, 2023 @04:52PM
(#35981137)
Sure as a general rule, but that doesn't render those experts free from criticism when they make mistakes. That low confidence scientific hypotheses were treated as high confidence scientific results is a valid critique of expert interaction with the general public, as it led to search engine censorship of objectively true information.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.