Goodbye, section 2.8 and hello to Cloudflare’s new terms of service

Re:Goodbye, section 2.8 and hello to Cloudflare’s new terms ... by anderspitman on Tuesday May 16, 2023 @11:26AM (#35963143)

I maintain a list of tunneling solutions[0]. One of the main reasons people choose not to use Cloudflare Tunnel for selfhosting is because technically hosting non-HTML content has been against their ToS. Anyone know if this change affects tunnels?

[0]: https://github.com/anderspitman/awesome-tunneling

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Goodbye, section 2.8 and hello to Cloudflare’s new terms ... by napsterbr on Tuesday May 16, 2023 @12:23PM (#35964077)

Apparently, there are no "service-specific terms" for Cloudflare Tunnel, so the only ToS for that service would be the "main" terms (i.e. the Self-Serve Subscription Agreement)[0].

Therefore, as long as you comply with it (especially the sections 2.2.1 and 2.7), you'd be fine. There are no explicit constraints regarding content type, just on what the content itself is or represents (e.g. illegal stuff).

Disclaimer: I'm definitely not a lawyer.

[0] - https://www.cloudflare.com/terms/

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Goodbye, section 2.8 and hello to Cloudflare’s new terms ... by Wallacy on Tuesday May 16, 2023 @12:35PM (#35964265)

Tunnels should be part of Cloudflare Access and they mention "GRE tunnels" and WARP with not mention about content type or bandwidth limit.

[ Parent | on HN ]