Re:Translating Akkadian clay tablets with ChatGPT?
by namaria on Tuesday May 16, 2023 @06:09AM
(#35959736)
I'd rather have access to less text that I know to be right then a lot that might be wrong in subtle ways I cannot detect.
Re:Translating Akkadian clay tablets with ChatGPT?
by kenjackson on Tuesday May 16, 2023 @07:08AM
(#35960138)
That’s a reasonable take. The opposite take is also reasonable. So I think there will be a market for both.
Re:Translating Akkadian clay tablets with ChatGPT?
by namaria on Tuesday May 16, 2023 @08:37AM
(#35961016)
There's a huge market for Real Housewives style 'reality' TV...
Re:Translating Akkadian clay tablets with ChatGPT?
by kenjackson on Tuesday May 16, 2023 @12:01PM
(#35963711)
There is. Better than a lot of what many critics consider good TV. Turns out that one size doesn’t fit all.
Re:Translating Akkadian clay tablets with ChatGPT?
by namaria on Tuesday May 16, 2023 @12:40PM
(#35964336)
No, and I'm glad there's something for everyone. I'd hate to live in a world where only things approved by some definition of good are available. Doesn't lead me to think that high demand for something makes that something a reasonable thing.
Re:Translating Akkadian clay tablets with ChatGPT?
by kenjackson on Tuesday May 16, 2023 @01:34PM
(#35965107)
You're basically saying that if you don't like the take then it's not reasonable. I find that unreasonable. :-)
Re:Translating Akkadian clay tablets with ChatGPT?
by namaria on Tuesday May 16, 2023 @03:11PM
(#35966277)
I think "cheap iffy translations are great because cheap" and "rich people drinking and fighting over parties" are pretty unreasonable things. I'm proud of that stance.
Still, I’ve been able to use GPT4 to read Latin fluently… and I often find it’s translations to be more readable. It here is an insane amount of untranslated Latin—and now I don’t have to pay 8k just to read a book.