Re:Copyright enforcement and the Internet: we just haven't t...
by thyrsus on Wednesday February 15, 2012 @02:31PM
(#3595664)
There's an important comment in that article. Tanner Swett says:
[T]here's already a word for the concept of Colour: "provenance"
So, to enforce copyright, it would be necessary to produce the "provenance" of any artifact (e.g. USB key) in our posession at any time. And, of course, that doesn't mean having the sales receipt from the grocery store where you bought it, it means being able to produce a record of every data transfer it ever made, and then records of every data transfer those devices ever made, ad infinitum, ad absurdum.
Re:Copyright enforcement and the Internet: we just haven't t...
by nooneelse on Wednesday February 15, 2012 @03:04PM
(#3595798)
Perhaps a short educational film is needed to communicate this more widely. I'm thinking something with a sinister-looking Gestapo-knock-off 'media agent' coming into a home asking to see their blue-rays' and computers' papers, and those papers' papers.
Re:Copyright enforcement and the Internet: we just haven't t...
by Fargren on Wednesday February 15, 2012 @03:33PM
(#3595923)
So, Terry Gilliam's Brazil?
Re:Copyright enforcement and the Internet: we just haven't t...
by nooneelse on Wednesday February 15, 2012 @03:49PM
(#3595968)
Well, it is no good mandating citizens only have computers which respect the grand unified provenance management system and then allowing the gaping loophole of unauthorized computer repair. So yeah, not too far from that.
Re:Copyright enforcement and the Internet: we just haven't t...
by repsilat on Wednesday February 15, 2012 @06:26PM
(#3596643)
Interesting - that article is one of my favourites, but I always thought the conclusion was a little more balanced. In addition to the idea that legislators and content creators don't understand bits, I think that the author also wanted to say that programmers and netizens don't understand "colour".
Re:Copyright enforcement and the Internet: we just haven't t...
by AdrianRossouw on Wednesday February 15, 2012 @07:59PM
(#3596924)
yes, it was definitely more balanced.
I missed a newline before the sentence beginning with 'my opinion is'.
Although, in his last example around one time pads, he points out that even in an area where the colour of bits really matters to programmers/cryptographers (whether or randomly generated numbers are in fact random), it is not actually possible for us to do determine wether they are random just by looking at them.
In the second to last paragraph he says the following:
"I think it's time for computer people to take Colour more seriously - if only so that we can better explain to the lawyers why they must give up their dream of enforcing Colour inside Friend Computer, where Colour does not and cannot exist."
It's going to take a new generation who have grown up with the internet to wipe this slate clean.
[1] http://ansuz.sooke.bc.ca/lawpoli/colour/2004061001.php