To be frank, considering the use of a pseudonym and comment history, I'm going to assume whoever is behind this account is intentionally writing in a provocative manner, perhaps to earn karma quickly or some other reason.
Breaking the HN rules and guidelines is quite detrimental when your already starting off with lower credibility.
So you were provided with a necessary correction. To be frank, I'm not sure what other kind of response you were expecting.
One that follows all the HN rules and guidelines.
The majority of passing readers disagree with the alleged reading considering that they have not saw fit to downvote my previous comments.
So I think it's fair to say this is mostly, or entirely, in your own imagination.
To put it in a different way:
Imputing intentions to another HN user can at best cause an account's legitimacy, credibility, veracity, etc., to remain the same.
It's not possible for it to be boosted.
And given the already moderately suspicious nature of a pseudonymous 69 day old account with so much karma, it's far more likely to reduce it.
It's also not a "nostalgia", or regional grievance party in any meaningful sense.
In other words, observations in the parent message that you are vociferously attacking ... are basically valid.
If you're genuinely unaware of these facts, I would suggest you attempt to inform yourself at a level beyond that of a few casual keyword searches.