News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Stories We’ve Seen Too Often by ilyt on Monday May 15, 2023 @11:34AM (#35949902)
To be entirely fair

> Scientist uses himself or herself as test subject.

This is very real plot that even got some people Nobel prize

https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/medicine/2005/press-releas...

Interview with some details

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yPLA69a5OOU

Re:Stories We’ve Seen Too Often by permo-w on Monday May 15, 2023 @12:18PM (#35950637)
also surely “scientist experiments on themselves” is far too broad to dismiss out of hand
Re:Stories We’ve Seen Too Often by the_af on Monday May 15, 2023 @12:32PM (#35950850)
I don't think any in the list are dismissals. If you remove every item, you're left with nothing that can be said about anything in scifi. The items also include plots used by acknowledged authors in celebrated stories.

This is like TV Tropes: a trope is neither good nor bad, it just is. It can be overused, it can be subverted, it can be played straight or played with, but the one thing you cannot do: avoid tropes entirely.

Re:Stories We’ve Seen Too Often by permo-w on Tuesday May 16, 2023 @01:50PM (#35965311)
I’m not suggesting tropes are bad or good in themselves, I’m just suggesting that the tone of this article is pretty dismissive
Re:Stories We’ve Seen Too Often by the_af on Tuesday May 16, 2023 @05:35PM (#35968072)
Right, misread your comment. Yes, the article is a bit dismissive, and I think it's a mistake on the author(s) part.