Re:The EU act is coming, this time for real probably
by konschubert on Friday May 12, 2023 @09:48AM
(#35916240)
This is a very balanced comment, strange that it is getting downvoted.
Re:The EU act is coming, this time for real probably
by zeroonetwothree on Friday May 12, 2023 @10:09AM
(#35916607)
Actually there is a huge amount of research into this. The wide consensus seems to be that the FDA is far too conservative and overall having more lax approvals would have saved many more lives in net.
Re:The EU act is coming, this time for real probably
by Taywee on Friday May 12, 2023 @11:02AM
(#35917298)
I would like to see this research.
Re:The EU act is coming, this time for real probably
by aqme28 on Friday May 12, 2023 @11:30AM
(#35917616)
Studies saying that the "FDA is too conservative" does not mean that the optimal situation would be no FDA at all.
Re:The EU act is coming, this time for real probably
by konschubert on Friday May 12, 2023 @11:56AM
(#35917987)
I don’t think anyone in this thread here is saying that there should be no FDA regulation at all?
We can't really know whether it was a net good or a net bad because we can't take a look at the reality that didn't happen. What we do know is that there were deadly medications on the market before the FDA. There were medications available over the counter that were outright poisonous. Arsenic and mercury were in common medicines.
It is a balance. You can sacrifice lives through inaction, or sacrifice lives in the way of progress. Lack of regulation is bad, but so is overregulation.