Re:We should start to add “ai.txt” as we do for “robots.txt”
by JohnFen on Thursday May 11, 2023 @09:46AM
(#35901983)
> I think people who don’t want their content contributing to AI shouldn’t have it on the public web.
Practically speaking, that's the only effective solution. I just think that it's a shame that's necessary. It would be better for everyone if there wasn't a disincentive to making works publicly available.
> I don’t want to have rules that biological humans can view and digital humans can’t.
This is a point we disagree on.
And "digital humans"? I would argue that such a thing can't exist, if you mean "human" in any way other than rough analogy.
Practically speaking, that's the only effective solution. I just think that it's a shame that's necessary. It would be better for everyone if there wasn't a disincentive to making works publicly available.
> I don’t want to have rules that biological humans can view and digital humans can’t.
This is a point we disagree on.
And "digital humans"? I would argue that such a thing can't exist, if you mean "human" in any way other than rough analogy.