News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on We should start to add “ai.txt” as we do for “robots.txt”. Parent comment

Re:We should start to add “ai.txt” as we do for “robots.txt” by throwaway290 on Wednesday May 10, 2023 @01:40PM (#35890696)
The output product is an automatically created (no sweat of the brow) derivative work, copyright very much applies especially if derivative work is generated for sale (like in case of openai).
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:We should start to add “ai.txt” as we do for “robots.txt” by efreak on Friday May 12, 2023 @06:33PM (#35923369)
> especially since the tool is used to generate derivative works for profit (like in case of openai/microsoft).

Profit/nonprofit is irrelevant to copyright.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:We should start to add “ai.txt” as we do for “robots.txt” by throwaway290 on Sunday May 14, 2023 @01:05PM (#35939411)
Where (and more importantly how) do you live that you don't have fair use exception?
[ Parent | on HN ]