Re:UN Human Rights Chief Urges UK to Reverse ‘Deeply Troubli...
by Veen on Tuesday May 09, 2023 @06:08AM
(#35872081)
Isn't it annoying how hard it is to ban behaviour you don't like without risking banning behaviour you approve of. What's a progressive authoritarian to do?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:UN Human Rights Chief Urges UK to Reverse ‘Deeply Troubli...
by maxehmookau on Tuesday May 09, 2023 @06:26AM
(#35872203)
It's not that simple.
They haven't been banned, they've been moved 100m down the road from outside the doors of the clinic.
A very fair, and reasonable compromise I feel.
Re:UN Human Rights Chief Urges UK to Reverse ‘Deeply Troubli...
by dataduck on Tuesday May 09, 2023 @06:30AM
(#35872239)
Would it be fair to allow anti-monarchy protesters to protest only 100m from anyone celbrating the coronation?
Re:UN Human Rights Chief Urges UK to Reverse ‘Deeply Troubli...
by silasdavis on Tuesday May 09, 2023 @06:47AM
(#35872380)
Surely 100 yards would be more appropriate
Re:UN Human Rights Chief Urges UK to Reverse ‘Deeply Troubli...
by flumpcakes on Tuesday May 09, 2023 @07:35AM
(#35872752)
I think there's a difference between protesting an event and protesting individuals seeking medical help.