News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Htmx Is the Future by marcosdumay on Friday May 05, 2023 @03:01PM (#35833752)
Back in the late 90's and early 00's, armed with the experience of C, C++, Bash, and Perl, everybody knew it very clearly that "batteries included" is the correct way to create development tools.

I don't know about the current fashion of minimalism comes from. It doesn't bring simplicity.

Re:Htmx Is the Future by hdjjhhvvhga on Friday May 05, 2023 @03:37PM (#35834157)
> C, C++, Bash, and Perl

While I agree with your comment, lumping these together somehow doesn't seem fair. As for C and C++, it took decades to develop package managers, and we can't still say we have standard ones (but I feel Conan is a de facto standard PM for C++).

Bash, on the other hand, should never have 'batteries included' because in this case the batteries are the rest of the system - coreutils and the rest. An Perl had CPAN quite early on, in the early nineties iirc.

Re:Htmx Is the Future by marcosdumay on Friday May 05, 2023 @06:48PM (#35836031)
C is completely without batteries, the stdlib for C++ was a great change and a big force towards people adopting it. The same happened with Bash and Perl (and people did migrate a lot of things into the later).
Re:Htmx Is the Future by itronitron on Saturday May 06, 2023 @12:14AM (#35837903)
If someone releases a module that depends on nine other modules then their module will likely be promoted by the authors of the other modules, rinse and repeat.