Re:Arianespace CEO: Europe won't have reusable rockets for a...
by peterfirefly on Friday May 05, 2023 @03:14PM
(#35833907)
Pegasus didn't have much of a path towards bigger payloads, though.
(It's launched from underneath an airplane.)
Re:Arianespace CEO: Europe won't have reusable rockets for a...
by panick21_ on Friday May 05, 2023 @04:49PM
(#35834990)
> That would be Pegasus in 1990, though.
Fair point.
> There were plenty of engines developed in the US in that timeframe.
Engines that actually flew or at least fully finished development. As far as I know there are none.
Re:Arianespace CEO: Europe won't have reusable rockets for a...
by orbital-decay on Friday May 05, 2023 @07:50PM
(#35836546)
BA-810 (by a SpaceX predecessor, huge cheap engine!), Fastrac, RS-68, XRS-2200, TR-106, to name a few. These are only large liquid fuel engines created from scratch which either flew or have been fully tested in the US in a decade before the Merlin-1A. There were many more solids, derivatives, small engines, upper stage engines etc.
That would be Pegasus in 1990, though.
> The first new rocket engine developed in the US for decades.
There were plenty of engines developed in the US in that timeframe. Merlin in particular was a "spiritual successor" of the Fastrac, and Kestrel was implemented by the former Beal Aerospace engineers who worked on BA-2 before being hired by SpaceX.