Re:America’s first high-volume ‘PFAS Annihilator’ is up and ...
by erulabs on Friday May 05, 2023 @12:14PM
(#35831341)
My RO system works purely on water pressure and requires no electricity. Do you mean the increased pressure causes increased power consumption?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:America’s first high-volume ‘PFAS Annihilator’ is up and ...
by engineer_22 on Friday May 05, 2023 @12:22PM
(#35831495)
Water Pressure is a form of potential energy, like rolling a ball up a hill. The RO system is high pressure on the raw side and low pressure on the clean side - the difference in pressure is the consumed energy.
Re:America’s first high-volume ‘PFAS Annihilator’ is up and ...
by erulabs on Friday May 05, 2023 @04:31PM
(#35834786)
Right that makes sense, but if that’s a serious drain of energy then one would imagine clogged pipes cause dramatically more waste?
Seems like small potatoes compared to having clean drinking water.
Re:America’s first high-volume ‘PFAS Annihilator’ is up and ...
by engineer_22 on Friday May 05, 2023 @09:26PM
(#35837081)
Fair point. At utility scale the power requirement is non-trivial. Like anything, there's more than one way to do it, and there's pros and cons to everything. It's up to the owner to decide what they're comfortable with :)
Re:America’s first high-volume ‘PFAS Annihilator’ is up and ...
by bacon_waffle on Saturday May 06, 2023 @07:08AM
(#35840174)
I understand that the difference in pressure at the inlet and outlet of the RO system indicates that work was done moving the water through the system, but the RO system is there to fill a glass of water - it's not clear to me why the outlet pressure is relevant.
Are you saying that the amount of energy it takes to deliver a given volume of water, varies based on the resistance at the outlet?