Started before all problems had been fixed with Flamanville and Olkiluoto, it's a part of the initial generation.
Is not the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results?
When building complex infrastructure for the second/third/etc. time? Of course not. Economies of scale is the term you're looking for.
Hinkley is the fourth time, still no dice.
When has nuclear ever had economies of scale?
Do you have any examples of a very high cost reactor dropping by a significant amount on a subsequent build?
South Korea was able to eke our small decreases in cost (though some people have ended up in jail for falsifying record keeping). But otherwise, costs tend to rise. And I'm definitely not aware of a drop of 50% or so, to bring these excessive costs into the realm of competitiveness.
> Since construction began in March 2017, the project has been subject to several delays, including some caused by the COVID-19 pandemic,[10] and this has resulted in significant budget overruns. As of May 2022, the project is two years late and the expected cost is £25–26 billion,[11] 50% more than the original budget from 2016. It is currently planned to be commissioned in June 2027 and has a projected lifetime of 60 years. In February 2023, EDF announced that costs would rise to £32.7bn and completion would be delayed by a further 15 months to September 2028.[2][12]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hinkley_Point_C_nuclear_power_...