America’s first high-volume ‘PFAS Annihilator’ is up and running in W. Michigan

Re:America’s first high-volume ‘PFAS Annihilator’ is up and ... by atleastoptimal on Thursday May 04, 2023 @06:03PM (#35822751)

I think generally solutions should be applied in proportion to

1. The relative harm of the type of PFA to human and animal health 2. The longevity of that PFA in the environment 3. The removal/price ratio for any technique getting rid of that PFA 4. How likely that PFA in the environment will infiltrate water supplies, food supplies, the biosphere

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:America’s first high-volume ‘PFAS Annihilator’ is up and ... by engineer_22 on Thursday May 04, 2023 @10:50PM (#35824704)

> 2. The longevity of that PFA in the environment

They're the "forever" chemicals. Like mercury in tuna fish.

PFAS are handy, but there are alternatives. The potential for harm is documented, and developed nations have a duty to consider protecting their populations from their effects.

[ Parent | on HN ]