No (and screw you for your unwarranted downvote you ass)
> Python 3 is causing serious pain, does django work with it yet?
I did not deny that, I denied your equation of Python 3 with Ruby 1.9 when they have absolutely nothing in common and had very different goals.
> Second, who cares why JRuby is more mature, it is.
That's not the issue with your question, the issue is that you cherrypick a single alternative implementation which supports whatever claim you're trying to make and ignore all others. That makes your claim both dishonest and irrelevant.
IronPython is more mature than IronRuby, Pypy is more mature than Rubinius, by your comment that makes 2 for 1 therefore Python is superior to Ruby right? That's nonsense, because your original assertion is nonsense.
But hey, at the end of the day I couldn't expect much more from somebody who decided to turn a discussion on relative merits into a dick-size contest. I guess the western ruby community has not matured as much as I thought it did. Thanks for bringing me back to reality.
I think the JVM is the more significant platform compared to the clr and rubinius/pypy. Therefore I think it's maturity is more significant.
Yours is by far the least pleasant and counterproductive thread on this entire discussion
Second, who cares why JRuby is more mature, it is.