News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Samsung bans use of A.I. like ChatGPT for employees after... by Retric on Tuesday May 02, 2023 @09:43PM (#35796678)
Let’s not pretend Google search is what people mean when they say “cloud.” It’s about running internal processes on external systems.

As to the risks, many companies live and die by their internal secrets. These range from a private keys, customer lists, trading strategies, and similar trade secrets to actual serious R&D efforts.

Sometimes the damage is obvious such as crypto exchanges suddenly finding themselves broke, but corporate espionage can also be kept quite. Losing major government bids because a competitor read some internal memo’s is a serious risk and you may never know.

Re:Samsung bans use of A.I. like ChatGPT for employees after... by jupp0r on Tuesday May 02, 2023 @11:17PM (#35797424)
Again, how do you know that somebody doesn't put something sensitive into the Google Search bar?
Re:Samsung bans use of A.I. like ChatGPT for employees after... by mixmastamyk on Wednesday May 03, 2023 @12:40AM (#35798081)
* * *
Re:Samsung bans use of A.I. like ChatGPT for employees after... by Retric on Wednesday May 03, 2023 @06:59AM (#35800771)
The actual history of companies losing secrets.

It’s much harder to reconstruct actionable intelligence from a huge stream of people using Google search even if they’re using it to preform sensitive calculations.

Re:Samsung bans use of A.I. like ChatGPT for employees after... by scarface74 on Wednesday May 03, 2023 @01:04AM (#35798233)
How many companies do you think have people who know security as well as Azure, GCP or AWS (disclaimer: my employer)?
Re:Samsung bans use of A.I. like ChatGPT for employees after... by Retric on Wednesday May 03, 2023 @07:03AM (#35800813)
What percentage of companies do you think actually use AWS securely?

There’s plenty of high profile fuckups from people falling to AWS specific gotcha’s.