There are so many Emacs chat-gpt packages already. How does this one differ from xenodium/chatgpt-shell? That one too, has org-mode integration.

How many of them specifically integrate with org-babel? I agree that there are a ton of Emacs packages trying to take advantage of ChatGPT, but I don't remember any particular ones that integrate with org-babel to give you a sort of "AI-assisted notebooks" software.

> How many of them specifically integrate with org-babel?

The one I asked about. It does integrate with babel. I simply didn't know to what extent.

org-ai does and was recommended here before[1]

[1] https://github.com/rksm/org-ai

chatgpt-shell in org-mode does not support chaining together multiple messages whereas org-assistant supports:

#+BEGIN_SRC ?

A

#+END_SRC

#+BEGIN_EXAMPLE

A-response

#+END_EXAMPLE

#+BEGIN_SRC ?

B

#+END_SRC

Where if you run Ctrl-c Ctrl-C on the block it sends the conversation to chatgpt:

User: A

Assistant: A-response

User: B

This enables notebook style development if you are tinkering with a prompt and want to see how the responses cascade based on further input.

Oh, that's cool. I'll give it a try. Thank you!

Clarification question: When you press C-c C-c on the B block, what is sent to ChatGPT, only B or the whole previous conversation? If the latter, this would break Org Babel semantics. Not necessarily a dealbreaker, but something to be aware of.

It's the whole previous conversation prior to the top level headline containing the block.

Makes sense, I won't be changing it from the current way. I think chatgpt-shell works more idiomatically in the org way in that context so that can be an alternative for people who prefer the former variant.

Wonder which package would replace M-x doctor.