Well, in some cases, negligence is sufficient for a lie or deception. E.g. forgetting to properly cite results is plagiarism, whether you intended to lie or not.
Maybe it makes sense to hold the owner of the hardware that produces these <hallucinations/lies/failures/deceptions/confabulations> accountable for it. In many places with freedom of speech, this will be difficult probably.
Is the guy who adds an edit whilst citing a seemingly credible source also a liar? No, they're wrong.
Intent is everything. AI does not have intent. Don't feed the animals, don't personify the LLM.