News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Banana Equivalent Dose by SiempreViernes on Tuesday May 02, 2023 @05:58AM (#35785314)
Mostly it is an example of failing at science communication, as highlighting the radioactivity of a banana basically just serves to make bananas seem more scary. Because radioactivity is scary: it can lethally damage without you feeling anything before your start puking.

Saying living next to a reactor is safe because even bananas contains a bit of radioactivity is somewhat like saying living next to a Ebola lab is safe because there are viruses in bananas... it's not really speaking to the fear of getting caught up in the fallout when bad things happen at the reactor.

Re:Banana Equivalent Dose by ithkuil on Tuesday May 02, 2023 @06:06AM (#35785371)
yeah, as always it really depends who are you communicating something to
Re:Banana Equivalent Dose by Nexxius on Tuesday May 02, 2023 @07:21AM (#35785894)
Fruit are scary! The brits used to give lessons (1970's) on defending yourself against a variety of fruit attacks, here is a clip (https://youtu.be/MlroOdP8p2Y)
Re:Banana Equivalent Dose by now__what on Tuesday May 02, 2023 @11:02AM (#35788544)
> speaking to the fear of getting caught up in the fallout when bad things happen at the reactor.

The comparison focuses on the normal amount of background radiation from living near a nuclear plant, so fear of fallout "when bad things happen" is a separate issue and irrelevant to the banana example. The Ebola lab comparison is a good one though.