News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Up next: the lawsuit threatening your YouTube watch queue by yamtaddle on Monday May 01, 2023 @05:43PM (#35779613)
> > If YouTube's algorithm is deciding what to show me, then I (as the user) am asking for YouTube's opinion. So I think that there is a coherent argument that YouTube's recommendation algorithm is expressing an opinion, and is therefore YouTube's content.

> To me it seems like a platform could easily skirt this by having users opt in to recommendations (and maybe even choose a sorting criteria option) at signup.

How does opting in make any difference, for this particular point?

Re:Up next: the lawsuit threatening your YouTube watch queue by flyingv on Monday May 01, 2023 @06:48PM (#35780340)
If a distinction was drawn (by SCOTUS or Congress) between search results (where you ask the platform to produce a ranked list based on search criteria) and recommendations (where you theoretically didn't "instruct" the platform to show them), I could see platforms adding a little modal to the signup flow being like "please instruct us to show you recommendations" and maybe surfacing a few settings for that, so they could later argue the recommendations were only served at your request (and thus should get search-result-style protection).