News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ignore Microsoft’s whines about the Activision takeover. ... by danaris on Monday May 01, 2023 @01:52PM (#35776547)
You said yourself that corporations can only do what they do according to certain rules.

Those rules are not the same as those for individuals.

That is precisely what it means to say that one person, with a certain amount of resources, can do things that a group of people, with the same amount of pooled resources, is forbidden from doing.

Re:Ignore Microsoft’s whines about the Activision takeover. ... by oh_sigh on Monday May 01, 2023 @03:32PM (#35777930)
The rules generally exist describing how group decision making occurs, how liability is distributed, etc, not rules limiting the rights of what the group can do.

Lord Templeman, law lord, in Hazell v Hammersmith and Fulham summarized the law thusly:

> That report[Case of Sutton's Hospital], although largely incomprehensible in 1990, has been accepted as "express authority" that at common law it is an incident to a corporation to use its common seal for the purpose of binding itself to anything which a natural person could bind himself and to deal with its property as a natural person might deal with his own