Re:Epstein's Private Calendar Reveals Prominent Names, Inclu...
by DANmode on Sunday April 30, 2023 @12:34PM
(#35764170)
This may be why the commenter used "popularized".
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Epstein's Private Calendar Reveals Prominent Names, Inclu...
by rainytuesday on Sunday April 30, 2023 @12:43PM
(#35764269)
You don't have to be patronizing, it's off-putting.
Re:Epstein's Private Calendar Reveals Prominent Names, Inclu...
by DANmode on Sunday April 30, 2023 @01:03PM
(#35764471)
If gently being corrected is off-putting, I'm not sure how to help.
Provide a recommendation for a more neutral tone? That was the intent.
Re:Epstein's Private Calendar Reveals Prominent Names, Inclu...
by rainytuesday on Sunday April 30, 2023 @01:09PM
(#35764526)
If you actually looked at the link, you could wonder what happened in the 1910s that popularized the word? Or wonder what caused that spike around 1960 and not just assume people are illiterate and in need your "gentle corrections".
Re:Epstein's Private Calendar Reveals Prominent Names, Inclu...
by DANmode on Sunday April 30, 2023 @01:20PM
(#35764620)
We're making the same point.
I was pointing out the purposeful use of the word "popularized" over "invented" or "created" or "made up", as it's written in poor reproductions of this conspiracy theory, because the verbiage a popular way to discredit the entire point.