Re:
by DangitBobby on Sunday April 30, 2023 @10:46AM
(#35763016)
Just watch the video. The title is maybe a little bit inflammatory, the content is not. If you're here to dispute the actual facts being discussed, cool, otherwise, this is an appeal to authority.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:
by SideburnsOfDoom on Sunday April 30, 2023 @10:54AM
(#35763086)
So, spend half an hour on it on the off chance it's not junk, in a field that is rife with politicised and inflammatory hot takes. That's a hard sell, frankly. I'll get back to you if I get the time.
I would not entirely dismiss as "appeal to authority" any filtering on such a field, that is so full of bad faith takes and misinformation. There's no shortage of that at all. And frankly, focusing on it as a pressing issue now, which it wasn't e.g. 10 years ago, is itself a culture-war distraction from more real things.
Re:
by DangitBobby on Monday May 01, 2023 @12:05AM
(#35768992)
If you aren't going to address then content, don't comment.
Re:
by SideburnsOfDoom on Thursday May 04, 2023 @04:56PM
(#35821948)
I feel fine ignoring Ms Hossenfelder's warmed-over second-hand bothsidesism. IDK why you are attached to it. But if you are, I fully expect you to also pore over what came out in it wake (I'm, replying now when it's in)
https://skepchick.org/2023/05/physicist-sabine-hossenfelder-...