News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Study: ChatGPT Outperforms Physicians in Quality, Empathetic Answers to Patients. Parent comment

Re:Study: ChatGPT Outperforms Physicians in Quality, Empathe... by isaacremuant on Saturday April 29, 2023 @07:43AM (#35752019)
Your experience is not different from OPs. You're just ok with the mistakes or are unaware of them because you don't know how to judge them.

I both use ChatGPT to boost productivity but also see the amount of mistakes it makes and will keep making and am surprised at the extreme denial of anyone who tries to shut down criticism of the wrong type of hype (the one that sells something that is not there)

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Study: ChatGPT Outperforms Physicians in Quality, Empathe... by geonnave on Saturday April 29, 2023 @07:54AM (#35752085)
Oh but it is: I find it useful. For example, I would not pay a lawyer for that contract, so having it draft me a mediocre contract is still better than having no contract.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Study: ChatGPT Outperforms Physicians in Quality, Empathe... by hammyhavoc on Saturday April 29, 2023 @11:07AM (#35753593)
A mediocre contract can be worse than having no contract, or as bad as having no contract if it isn't actually legally binding. Yikes.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Study: ChatGPT Outperforms Physicians in Quality, Empathe... by isaacremuant on Monday May 01, 2023 @06:25PM (#35780094)
It can be much much worse if you base key decisions on the belief that you have a contract and later find out that you didn't.

Thanks for such a clear cut example for my points.

[ Parent | on HN ]