Re:U.S. Rep. Angie Craig drops college requirement for staffers
by chongli on Friday April 28, 2023 @05:39PM
(#35747414)
Not all. I definitely believe large numbers of liberal arts schools are having problems. But my school (University of Waterloo) has only seen dramatic surges in enrolment over the past 5 years. They're putting up new buildings like crazy just to accommodate all of them! And we're not talking sports centres or rec complexes, we're talking about big lecture halls and buildings full of classrooms and study spaces!
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:U.S. Rep. Angie Craig drops college requirement for staffers
by version_five on Friday April 28, 2023 @05:46PM
(#35747473)
I don't know Waterloo's situation but I know that money for new buildings is largely decoupled from need for capacity and is mainly tied to government make-work projects. I remember during the 2008 "economic action plan" universities got all kinds of buildings. It was entirely because the government was giving free money away to stimulate growth.
Re:U.S. Rep. Angie Craig drops college requirement for staffers
by chaostheory on Friday April 28, 2023 @05:46PM
(#35747478)
This phenomena doesn’t apply to elite institutions.
Re:U.S. Rep. Angie Craig drops college requirement for staffers
by imranq on Friday April 28, 2023 @07:20PM
(#35748382)
We have a bimodal distribution. Elite universities whose prestige is already established have an "embarrassment of riches" in terms of applicant pool, whereas middling and low ranked universities without a moat are facing enrollment cliffs.
Applicants are trying to go big or go home (and learn online instead)
Re:U.S. Rep. Angie Craig drops college requirement for staffers
by mortenjorck on Friday April 28, 2023 @05:47PM
(#35747486)
I'm not sure a drop in admissions standards to address the enrollment cliff and a surge in admissions are necessarily mutually exclusive.