This is completely untrue. Even outside the exclusion areas there are signs of the damage the disaster has caused.
The Japanese government has raised the acceptable radiation limit for people living in the area from 1 to 20 milliSieverts per year. No-where else is this amount considered acceptable.
Even with this increase it's still dramatically below the measured amounts, which is up to 0.04 microSieverts per hour.
> doctors have left the area because the government refuses to reimburse them when they list radiation sickness as the cause for nose bleeds, spontaneous abortions, and other ailments resulting from ionizing radiation. (The only acceptable diagnoses are so-called “radiophobia,” nervousness, and stress.) The spike in thyroid cancer among children in Fukushima is dismissed as a survey error, produced by examining too many children.
https://thebulletin.org/2021/03/fukushima-today-im-glad-that...
Wind farms are designed to survive hurricanes anyway. See https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-08-31/harvey-pu...
There's some evidence that large off-shore wind farms reduce the severity of hurricanes too:
> A large array of offshore wind farms can have significant impacts on precipitation during a hurricane. This claim is proven through a series of simulation cases, with different layout configurations, inter-turbine spacings, and wind farm parameterizations. Precipitation is found to be reduced inland and increased offshore in all the wind farm simulations. However, the amount of precipitation reduction varies in the different cases. The location of the wind farm also matters.
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/aad245#...