Re:Europe Needs Digital Public Spaces That Are Independently...
by thrillgore on Thursday April 27, 2023 @10:52AM
(#35729029)
Seeing a lot of the replies here focus on the EU's prevalence of anti-hate speech laws, there's clearly one genus of the audience that sees the EU as being "restrictive" on their kind of free speech. Which is not surprising in the least.
As an American, I see nothing wrong with the EU's measures against hate speech. In the past decade, I've seen exactly where no limits on it leads to.
Re:Europe Needs Digital Public Spaces That Are Independently...
by deceptionatd on Friday April 28, 2023 @01:32AM
(#35737779)
My rule of thumb for evaluating laws: what could the most malicious person you can imagine do with that power?
'Hate speech' is a highly subjective category, and most proposals for hate speech laws that I've seen could be abused terribly.
Re:Europe Needs Digital Public Spaces That Are Independently...
by thrillgore on Sunday April 30, 2023 @10:55PM
(#35768621)
And my response to that is: Laws and decrees have to be written in what manner they can oppress the least, but its on the public to hold the right people accountable so these laws remain fair.
EDIT: While someone with a background in comparative legal analysis would be needed for a verification, I could also posit a hypothesis that both the EU's Charter and the national constitutions of most European countries grant more rights than the Constitution. That said, more is not always better from a constitutional law perspective, as the reform proposals in Chile clearly have showed.