News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Deep Floyd Text-to-Image Model Release. Parent comment

Re:Deep Floyd Text-to-Image Model Release by jrm4 on Wednesday April 26, 2023 @06:05PM (#35720647)
I am a lawyer, and as flimsy and wishy-washy as the term "open-source" already is, I can't even fathom what is meant by "open source" here?

Are people suggesting that "look at the code but don't touch" actually fits what some people think of as open source?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Deep Floyd Text-to-Image Model Release by netdur on Thursday April 27, 2023 @04:53AM (#35725163)
NOT a lawyer here, basially they meant, here the thing, please don't sue me if you messed up.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Deep Floyd Text-to-Image Model Release by jrm4 on Thursday April 27, 2023 @03:21PM (#35733256)
That's weird, because we do have extremely standard language to take care of that. That's just "warranty disclaimers"
[ Parent | on HN ]