Re:Thinking about our passive exposure to IPv6 issues
by yjftsjthsd-h on Wednesday April 26, 2023 @04:13PM
(#35719343)
Oh, sure; arguing that IPv6 doesn't, in any way shape or form, have enough addresses would be extremely misguided. I was reading it as "IPv4 already has enough address space (if we include NAT) so we don't need to deal with v6".
And, of course OP is wrong about 56 anyway, but so it goes