Re:UK Threatens End-to-End Encryption
by schmuelio on Monday April 24, 2023 @11:07AM
(#35688545)
I think it would be more apt to call it plenty of "evidence"...
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Yes, but it's an argument that just goes round and round forever. Conservatives think the BBC is run by a left-wing cabal. Leftists think it's an establishment mouthpiece run by the Tories. We've been having exactly the same argument since the 1960s.
https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/378/digital-cultu...
The chair is a Tory. We can then quibble over "run by", but you can't ignore the significant connections at high level.
The Chair, DG, and other higher-ups will almost always have either Labour or Tory connections, because those are the two main political parties. You'd be hard pushed to find a suitable candidate that wasn't connected at a high level.
No doubt you've dispassionately gone out of your way to assesss that evidence and after detailed examination decided it's invalid. Which would be a perfectl reasonable step to make - if that's what you did. Did you?