News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Machine Learning for Hackers Table of Contents by plessthanpt05 on Wednesday February 08, 2012 @04:10PM (#3568486)
I like (& use) R, but to say it is "for hackers" seems strange to me -- not really a "hacker" language. Seems like a bit of a marketing strategy(/gimmick) to toss that word into the title. Looks like a promising book, though i'd much prefer it be in a scripting language like Python.
Re:Machine Learning for Hackers Table of Contents by tikhonj on Wednesday February 08, 2012 @06:57PM (#3569169)
I haven't used R, but I've heard good things about it. Why isn't it for "hackers"?

If anything, it seems like a language more suited for hackers than Python for tasks involving math--it looks like it has a more integrated environment for fast iteration , particularly for generating nice plots of the data you're working with. It also seems like a language designed and optimized exactly for this sort of activity.

Re:Machine Learning for Hackers Table of Contents by programnature on Thursday February 09, 2012 @02:38AM (#3570184)
The problem with domain-specific systems like R is that, as software systems, you can't "hack" them far outside of their contraints.

Integration into other systems (like the web, or robust big-data pipelines) can't be taken for granted. Doing "standard" stuff becomes nonstandard, thus hacking can hit a wall.

Re:Machine Learning for Hackers Table of Contents by simonw on Thursday February 09, 2012 @04:11AM (#3570359)
R is open source, and there are plenty of "bridges" to talk to it from other languages (e.g. http://rpy.sourceforge.net/ )
Re:Machine Learning for Hackers Table of Contents by plessthanpt05 on Wednesday February 08, 2012 @08:23PM (#3569391)
I use R almost daily, and sure, for tasks involving math (& statistical analysis in particular) R is fantastic; however, to say "for hackers" (at least in my mind) would involve a less domain specific language -- like a scripting language (python or some such similar language) that has statistical analysis capabilities. Perhaps a matter of semantics, but in a similar vein, I imagine a book of the same title that used Octave would not be considered "for hackers" by most due to the specific/constrained functionality.

Just seems like "hacker" is such a buzz word now that it gets tacked onto a lot of stuff just to generate interest.