News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Godot-dodo – Finetuning LLaMA on single-language comment:code data pairs. Parent comment

Re:Godot-dodo – Finetuning LLaMA on single-language comment:... by flangola7 on Sunday April 23, 2023 @07:35PM (#35681859)
I'm not sure what MIT licensed code is supposed to do for you. Are you going to cite every repository ingested?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Godot-dodo – Finetuning LLaMA on single-language comment:... by brucethemoose2 on Sunday April 23, 2023 @08:02PM (#35682050)
Technically you could do that in a big text file...
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Godot-dodo – Finetuning LLaMA on single-language comment:... by _flux on Monday April 24, 2023 @04:49AM (#35685139)
I suppose for the model indeed you should do that?

But then maybe not for the actual predictions made by the model, as the MIT license says:

> The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software.

Arguably e.g. a single function is not a substantial portion of a multi-file project—and, usually, even that function itself is not going to be a verbatim copy but adjusted to your use case regarding variable names etc.

[ Parent | on HN ]